Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:32
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Liam Neeson, Pamela Anderson Team Up in ‘Naked Gun’ Reboot’s Full Trailer - Yahoo
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What sets porcini mushrooms apart from other types of mushrooms, such as button mushrooms?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What happen if all of a sudden a movie star decides to quit acting?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
If you were to write a book about being a K-pop fan, what would the last sentence be?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Anxious-depressed individuals underestimate themselves even when they’re right - PsyPost